Having been at this thing for a while, I thought it might be useful to compile some of the writings on this blog about GC2003's presenting issues: ordaining Robinson and blessing SSUs.
Oddly enough, the controversy brought me to active membership within the Episcopal Church once I saw that the decisions of GC2003 were rooted in what I thought was a persuasive, antecedently developed theology. It seemed--indeed it still seems--that controversy raged without serious theological engagement, despite what seemed to be an obvious opportunity. Now I would say with more confidence that the dearth of engagement from critics of GC2003 is deliberate, and not a matter of ignorance or oversight.
Some links:
Episcopal Argument & my Argument
An Older Version of my Argument
the Oldest Version
& Subsequent Debate:
I
II
III
IV
V
Charles I
Against Kendall Harmon's "Sex Without Form and Void"
I
II
III
IV
Reply to Witt
Against Harding's Critique of the Episcopal Church's Argument
I
II
III
On "Claiming our Anglican Identity"
I
II
III
Kennedy on Heresy
I
II
the homosexuals/ homosexual activity distinction
homosexuality and the Holocaust
the church and the ordination of active homosexuals
holiness
sexuality and personhood
reconciliation and SSUs
complementarity
Seitz on plain sense
the AAC and plain sense
Nigeria's laws
Lambeth 1998 1.10
Lambeth 1998 and epistemic humility
epistemic humility
defending epistemic humility against Harding
reading Romans I:26-7
plain sense and metaphysics
ACI on plain sense
more defense of epistemic humility against Harding
Against Gagnon
I
II
No comments:
Post a Comment