Having been at this thing for a while, I thought it might be useful to compile some of the writings on this blog about GC2003's presenting issues: ordaining Robinson and blessing SSUs.
Oddly enough, the controversy brought me to active membership within the Episcopal Church once I saw that the decisions of GC2003 were rooted in what I thought was a persuasive, antecedently developed theology. It seemed--indeed it still seems--that controversy raged without serious theological engagement, despite what seemed to be an obvious opportunity. Now I would say with more confidence that the dearth of engagement from critics of GC2003 is deliberate, and not a matter of ignorance or oversight.
Episcopal Argument & my Argument
An Older Version of my Argument
the Oldest Version
& Subsequent Debate:
Against Kendall Harmon's "Sex Without Form and Void"
Reply to Witt
Against Harding's Critique of the Episcopal Church's Argument
On "Claiming our Anglican Identity"
Kennedy on Heresy
the homosexuals/ homosexual activity distinction
homosexuality and the Holocaust
the church and the ordination of active homosexuals
sexuality and personhood
reconciliation and SSUs
Seitz on plain sense
the AAC and plain sense
Lambeth 1998 1.10
Lambeth 1998 and epistemic humility
defending epistemic humility against Harding
reading Romans I:26-7
plain sense and metaphysics
ACI on plain sense
more defense of epistemic humility against Harding